Sky's studio called City guilty; TNT's Joe Cole said the pitch is the one pure thing. The pundit split over the City verdict is really a split about what football is for.
The Manchester City verdict has produced a very particular kind of pundit argument: not about whether the club’s rivals are pleased, but about what a result means. According to The Irish Times, in a report published on 12 October about Sky’s studio discussion before City’s 3-0 win at Anfield, the broadcaster opened what the writer called an “inquest” into the club after the guilty verdict. City are appealing, and they claim to have “irrefutable evidence” of innocence. We are reporting what pundits said, not adjudicating the case.
The prosecution in the studio
Roy Keane was unmoved by Micah Richards’s emotional defence of the club. Richards, a City ambassador, said: “I feel devastated”, and later “But they’re appealing it.” Keane’s response was that “all you want is a bit of honesty”, and after the match he said: “Let’s hope they get beaten.” Jamie Carragher was blunter still, saying more than once: “They’re guilty now.”
Carragher also offered a broader accusation about the club’s power: “They are so powerful, so rich, they’ve never been told no before in their lives.” That is a view about how an institution behaves, which is a different kind of claim from the finding it follows.
The defence
The report records a different position from other broadcasters. Joe Cole of TNT Sports argued: “The only pure thing about football is what happens on the pitch.” Clinton Morrison made a related point, saying City “won on the pitch”. Paul Merson, in emphatic terms, argued that City had the two best players in every position, which is an argument about talent rather than process.
It is a coherent position. If a football match is the only event that cannot be arranged in a boardroom, then the trophies it produced have a claim on our respect that finances and paperwork cannot remove. The report says Martin Keown was reportedly left speechless by Cole’s defence, but that tells us about the room, not about the argument.
Where the disagreement lies
The difficulty with the pitch-first defence is that it answers a question that nobody in the studio was asking. Carragher and Keane were not claiming that City’s players could not play. Their complaint was about a club’s conduct and the standards it is held to. Cole’s argument and Carragher’s are, in that sense, talking past each other: one is about merit on the day, the other about the rules of the game surrounding it.
That is also why Richards’s defence landed differently. “They’re appealing it” is a procedural statement, and procedure is exactly what the verdict’s critics say the club has used to delay accountability. Keane’s reply, about honesty, was aimed at tone as much as substance.
The question the host asked
The most useful remark in the report came from the presenter, Mark Chapman: “Have we thought about how we analyse every City win from now on?” It is a practical question. Gary Neville, discussing Jeremy Doku’s goal, offered what sounds like an attempt to answer it: “A beautiful goal, not necessarily beautiful for the game.” Daniel Sturridge, who started at City before winning with Liverpool, reflected only on “What could have been”.
For television, that is the real problem. Pundits cannot ignore the case, but if each result is prefaced with a caveat, the analysis of the football gets crowded out. We looked at one version of that dilemma in Neville and Carragher on the City “stain”, and at the wider consequences for the title in Miguel Delaney’s warning that City’s perfect start may count for nothing.
Our view
The strongest form of Cole’s argument is not that the verdict does not matter, but that the two conversations should be kept apart. The strongest form of Keane’s and Carragher’s is that they cannot be. Until the appeal is resolved, that tension will run through every City broadcast, and viewers will have to decide which they find more convincing.
All quotations are taken from the Irish Times report linked above. The verdict and appeal are described as the report describes them.
Subscribe to Punditfeed on Google News for all the latest updates from the world of sports!
